Debunking Bolshevik Revolution Jew-Blaming

My X (Twitter) Response

As I’ve mentioned in several posts to The Bender Observatory, I am writing a book on the war in Ukraine and on the West becoming evermore socialist. This effort, incidentally, is why lately I’ve not posted as readily in this blog. When I came across a monarchist’s post on X, who blames Jews and freemasons for the Bolsheviks killing Tsar Nicholas II’s family, I noticed some glaring problems with his post, and responded, as it’s right up the alley of my book research. Since X posts have a limited length, I’ve added the following explanation, in addition to the included screenshots of the original post by @OCanonist and my response. Below the screenshots I’ve copied and pasted the original text for easier legibility. The key bits of the following supplementary info are in the comments section of the post, which I’ve not pasted here.

Blaming Bolshevism on Jews is nonsensical. Yes, Trotsky was ethnically Jewish. So what? Lenin and Stalin were not. Lenin was 1/4 ethnically Jewish (his maternal grandfather was Jewish). Stalin attended Christian school as a child in Georgia. But as socialists, all Bolsheviks were diametrically opposed to all religion. Furthermore, many people believe Stalin was an antisemite, due to his actions in his final years (1949-1953). However, Stalin provided weapons to proto-Israel in violation of a UN arms embargo signed by the Soviets and Americans, against supplying the Zionists or Arabs in Palestine. Ben-Gurion credited these secretly Soviet-backed, Czech-brokered arms for the establishment of the state. It appears that Israel subsequently not becoming communist enraged Stalin. He then engaged in a bloody, anti-Zionist/anti-western counterintelligence crackdown with antisemitic overtones, culminating in the Doctors’ Case, which was cut short by his death.

Beyond blaming Jews and freemasons, @OCanonist blames Alexandr Kerensky as supposedly being culpable for the Romanov (tsar) family murders, and when questioned by another X user about Kerensky escaping the Bolsheviks’ claws, he claims that Kerensky didn’t not flee the country, but rather went on a “planned retirement.” That is patently absurd. Permanent exile from your motherland is not such a nice retirement. And the circumstances in Russia make associating him with the Bolsheviks untenable:

Kerensky had become Prime Minister and Commander-in-Chief of the Provisional Government and military, respectively, following the February Revolution of 1917, which overthrew Tsar Nicholas II. The Bolsheviks became his biggest opposition, and he opposed their Red Army in late October (old calendar), with his 700-man Kerensky-Krasnov Uprising. He tried to recruit a larger force against the Bolsheviks, but was unable to. Nonetheless, his bloody cavalry and artillery assault against the Reds, which ended with him fleeing from their overwhelming numbers, renders this X poster’s theory, about Kerensky being a pal of the Bolsheviks, totally impossible.

What happened to Tsar Nicholas II’s family at the hands of the Bolsheviks is nothing less than horrific. I’m not a monarchist, nor a Bolshevik sympathizer. I’m not a Kerensky fan. I’m categorically opposed to socialism. And I’m categorically opposed to freemasonry. I understand why some people supported the Bolsheviks (the Bolsheviks became the Soviets) against the tsars—the tsars did have oppressive policies. That doesn’t mean that socialism was the right answer. I also understand why others supported the tsars. The subject is complex. Those who are unfamiliar with the subject may find this hard to follow, but if you take the time to read this short article, you will nevertheless glean some interesting and valuable information. This subject is important for Christians and conservatives to understand.

OCanonist writes:

One of the most tragic photographs of the 20th century. A multi-thousand person prayer gathering of Russian Orthodox Christians on Moscow’s Red Square in August 1917. They were celebrating the opening of the great local council, which would elect Patriarch Tikhon to lead the Russian Orthodox Church later in that year.

Many were unaware, or worse yet - knew, that their Tsar was sitting imprisoned since March 1917 in St Petersburg with his wife and children, undergoing psychologically torture, abuse, harassment and was being ‘prepared’ to be sacrificed in Yekaterinburg.

The post-Tsar government in the country was completely usurped & controlled by Freemasons of the Grand Orient lodge, and in only two months time - in October of 1917, that same Masonic government would usher in the Talmudic Bolshevik butchers to ‘complete the ritual’.

In a sign of almost science fiction level black comedy & satire, something akin to George Lucas’ Star Wars- the greatest enemy of Russia, Alexander Kerensky, the Grand Master of all Russian freemasonry attended the Orthodox Council as a ‘guest of honor’. Surrounded by future martyrs, the demon-possessed mason sat the council, attended the Church services, smirking, knowing that in less than 6 months time the blood of Orthodox Christians will begin flowing like a river through the land - and nobody in the room could see it coming.

Perhaps the only person alive in the country who could have saved Russia from the Talmudic Revolution, Tsar Nicholas ii, was isolated and trapped. He was Himself, prepared as the sacrifice, the kapparot, the “royal tribute”, to an ancient pre-Christian collegium of demons. Nobody came to his aid, the council of Bishops did not mention Him by name, did not recognize the sheer devastation that was about to commence - and did not call for His liberation.

The vast majority of the Orthodox laity and clergy had no idea that their ‘negligence’ and inactivity in this time of strife would lead to the greatest mass martyrdom & genocide the world has ever seen.

Many Orthodox saints would later remember this time with tears & sorrow, about how the mass delusion and lukewarmness clouded the minds of the Russian multitudes. This is evident in the sermons, confessions & writings of the new-martyrs who understood their own mistakes in that tumultuous “1917” before they were marched off to the firing ranges and torture chambers by the grandchildren of Rabbis, cultists of Baal and their very own apostatized, former spiritual children.

May we finally realize the mistakes of our ancestors, and never repeat them.

LargEasyMoney asks:

Can you explain why did Kerensky had to then flee Russia from the Bolcheviks and exile to France shortly after this moment ?

OCanonist replies:

It wasn’t as much an escape as it was a planned retirement. He was made redundant.

Plenty of legends were then created to show some sort of non-existent tension between Provisional Government & the Петросовет. A good analogy is the two party system in the U.S.

LargEasyMoney replies:

Thank you

I reply:

^This exposé is largely inaccurate.

After the 1905 revolution, Nicholas II legalized Masonry. Per Lenin, the Bolsheviks re-banned Masonry. And the Bolsheviks were multiethnic. They preached equality per socialism (while declaring class war). In 1922, after the SR Trial (which shortly followed completing the new legal code), they shot 14 SRs Kerensky had helped lead.

Depriving them of defense lawyers, the Soviets charged Socialist Revolutionary Party members (SRs) with ten inflated charges including ‘having STARTED the Civil War.’ Those damned audacious SRs had dared resist the Bolsheviks’ October Revolution! They were also charged with plotting to destroy state property, for having planned to bomb a railroad track, to keep the Bolsheviks from paying the Germans a trainload of gold per the Brest-Litovsk Treaty. Never mind the value of the gold they sought to save for Russia! -(see A. Isayevich Solzhenitsyn, Gulag Archipelago, pt. I & II, p. 355-357)

The Bolsheviks’ socialist ideology is what led them to destroy the Church. They melted down over a million bronze Church bells, many made by medieval masters of the casting craft, from as early as the 10th century.

They confiscated Church valuables, even those with liturgical and sacramental value, under the guise of relief for the devastating Volga Famine, that their Civil War had caused by taking all the men away from working the fields. ‘Relief’ was no more than a pretext for crushing the Church. Lenin had no concern for the starving. And, because Tikhon had insisted on donating Church valuables for the relief, as he considered their outright confiscation ‘sacrilege’ (svyatotatstvo—святотатство; literally “holy theft”), this mild resistance gave the Soviets an excuse to blame the Church for not relieving the famine more readily. -(ibid, p. 346,350)

Dostoyevsky wrote: “…socialism is not merely the labor question, it is BEFORE ALL THINGS the ATHEISTIC question, the question of the form taken by atheism today. It is the question of the Tower of Babel built without God, not to mount to Heaven from Earth, but to set up Heaven on Earth.”—(My emphatic caps, The Brothers Karamazov, 1880, p. 26, Signet Publishing)

In other words, socialists ‘scientifically’ theorize their brilliant designs for society, because they aim to create an earthly utopia, since they don’t believe in Heaven or God. This inevitably leads to having to liquidate their opposition or “wreckers,” when they fail to even feed the masses, much less create their promised land.

Tikhon only survived the Soviet show Moscow Church Trial (Apr. 26th-May 7th, 1922) because of his status. It would’ve been too glaring at the time to shoot him. 4 other clergy in the trial weren’t so lucky [RIP]. (Soviet soldiers arrested people for overzealously welcoming Metropolitan Veniamin outside of the court of the later Petrograd Church Trial (June 9th-July 5th, 1922).) Half of the Soviets inside instinctively arose when Tikhon entered the Moscow court. But Tikhon was opposed to the Soviets. He told Prosecutor Krylenko that he recognized Soviet authority only insofar as it didn’t violate ecclesiastical law. And he refused to name names.

BTW, socialists blaming ‘Stalinism’ for Soviet ills is diversionary. Socialism was the root cause. Likewise, Hitler scapegoated ‘the’ Jews and communists (Reichstag Fire false flag), after the Social[ist] Democrats failed to make Weimar a utopia. His National Socialists had a final solution. To boot, Napoleon Bonaparte was a vehement Jacobin socialist, who in the French Revolution shot ‘a whiff of grapeshot’ at his fellow (counterrevolutionary) citizens in the name of socialist lllliberation of France. Hundreds were killed. But Napoleon’s tyranny after ‘coming to power’—as Lenin would’ve called it—is blamed on ‘Bonapartism.’ Socialists will never accept that their own ideology is responsible for these historical atrocities. ‘Those weren’t real socialists!’ they insist. ‘WE are the real geniuses who will do it right!’

Thanks for reading! God bless you! Please share and subscribe!