Well, it’s unfair to say you’re presenting “contrary evidence,” without identifying what you find incorrect—contrary to what? And then trying to send me on a wild goose chase saying “go read books about ‘it’” is an unidentified-straw-man argument that obviously I cannot win.
The points I make are specific, and refuting ‘O’Canonists’ exposé: Contrary to his statements, Kerensky cannot be considered to have been pro-Bolshevik, Lenin was only 1/4 Jewish and was raised ‘Christian,’ and Stalin was an active revolutionary (and was sent to Siberia for revolutionary activity—he robbed/extorted, to raise Bolshevik funds) and was not Jewish, and was later revealed to be anti-Semitic. These are obviously big holes in O’Canonist’s exposé.
The Bolsheviks’ communist ideology was essentially international(ist) socialism, and as such, they specifically advocated racial (and gender) equality, and were rabidly anti-religious. With these considerations in mind, there could be nothing outwardly anti-Jewish ethnicity or pro-Jewish ethnicity/religion about the Bolsheviks.
(The Rurik dynasty did not allow Jews to live in Rus/Russia, and then under the Romanov dynasty (starting with Catherine), they imposed the Pale of Settlement laws, restricting where Jews could live and what businesses they could have.)
Jews therefore participated in the Bolshevik cause, but so did other groups (who in other cases were anti-Semitic), such as ethnic Russians, Poles, Letts, Caucasians, etc.
Well, it’s unfair to say you’re presenting “contrary evidence,” without identifying what you find incorrect—contrary to what? And then trying to send me on a wild goose chase saying “go read books about ‘it’” is an unidentified-straw-man argument that obviously I cannot win.
The points I make are specific, and refuting ‘O’Canonists’ exposé: Contrary to his statements, Kerensky cannot be considered to have been pro-Bolshevik, Lenin was only 1/4 Jewish and was raised ‘Christian,’ and Stalin was an active revolutionary (and was sent to Siberia for revolutionary activity—he robbed/extorted, to raise Bolshevik funds) and was not Jewish, and was later revealed to be anti-Semitic. These are obviously big holes in O’Canonist’s exposé.
The Bolsheviks’ communist ideology was essentially international(ist) socialism, and as such, they specifically advocated racial (and gender) equality, and were rabidly anti-religious. With these considerations in mind, there could be nothing outwardly anti-Jewish ethnicity or pro-Jewish ethnicity/religion about the Bolsheviks.
(The Rurik dynasty did not allow Jews to live in Rus/Russia, and then under the Romanov dynasty (starting with Catherine), they imposed the Pale of Settlement laws, restricting where Jews could live and what businesses they could have.)
Jews therefore participated in the Bolshevik cause, but so did other groups (who in other cases were anti-Semitic), such as ethnic Russians, Poles, Letts, Caucasians, etc.
Hi Joe, I don't want a debate. Just forwarding contrary evidence.
https://fitzinfo.net/2021/11/30/chabad-russian-revolution-kabbalah-jewish-messianism/
Begin at "Pawns In The Game" which is still in print. I recommend reading books over at www.Heritage-History.com / secret. https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=library&s=secret. Also, follow HenryMakow.com . He has many posts that prove Hitler worked for Zionists. Makow is a Jewish historian, anti-Zionist.